[双语翻译]--国际贸易外文翻译--韩美自由贸易协定研究

1、中文 中文 3000 字， 字，1750 单词， 单词，1 万英文字符 万英文字符出处： 出处：Jaesung L. A Study on FTA Between Korea and USA[J]. International Business FTA; IT; Shipbuilding; High-Tech industryINTRODUCTIONAs Korea who is depending on international

2、trade, especially the situation that export volume to USA is absolutely enormous, if FTA between Korea-USA is conducted, green light will be on in the export side. In case export is activated, domestic economic growth ra

3、te will be increased into so that point. Additionally, domestically, foreign capital investment increase as well as industrial activation which eventually result in expectation for employment rate increase. With politica

4、l viewpoint, Signing of FTA between Korea-USA will make improve Korea-USA alliance relationship as well as pave crucial basement that Korea will be developed into hub of Northeast Asia.On the other hand, when we see NAFT

5、A case, we can figure out failure of Korea-USA FTA. It’s only USA who got favor through NAFTA. Per Canada, they got into trouble as they wish to realize welfare policy as well as the unemployed is increased gradually. In

6、 case of Mexico,majority of nation fell down to destitute poor or low-income people and only few wealthy people could enjoy these benefits. Additionally, if we obey prerequisite conditions that US requests in the Korea

7、-USA FTA such as diminish or abolition of screen quota, re-import for US beef, stop re-negotiation for medicine price, easing auto exhaust restriction, even the Korean culture will be subordinated and infrastructure like

8、 public service, etc. will be collapsed. 1. THINGS TO BE CONSIDERED IN ADVANCE SIGNING FTA1.1 Investor-State Dispute (ISD)It is the most powerful clause that destroys national sovereignty. US-based enterprises (transnat

9、ional capital) sue Korean law and policy which hamper their profits to international The Americans and US enterprise advance into Korea are applied by clause of Korea-USA FTA instead of Korean government law as superior

10、law.Therefore, even though US-based enterprises conducts illegal act, Korean government cannot restrict US-based enterprises according to Korea-USA FTA clause and in case Korean government try to restrict them, they will

11、 release law suit against Korean government in the name of hinder of sales activities.1.8 Concession to Non-Business Set-Up RightEven though US-based enterprises do not establish advance entry into Korea enterprise, they

12、 are available to run their own business.Overseas affiliated company who do not report registration is not able to be restricted, punished or tax levied by Korean domestic law.1.9 Absolute Privatization for Public Corpor

13、ation and Abolition of Restriction to Foreigner’s Holding SharesUS-based enterprises and capitalism can take over Korean high-valued public enterprise. US enterprise and US capitalism can attend tender for privatization

14、for medical insurance corporation, Korea electricity, Korea oil corporation, KT, Korea agricultural & fishery product corporation, Korea housing corporation, Korea water resource corporation, KBS, Korea railway corpo

15、ration, Korea subway corporation, Korea postal corporation, etc. In case the public corporations who give crucial effects to ordinary people economy is transferred into US enterprise or US capital system and is out of co

16、ntrol from Korean government, a great rise of public utility charges cannot be controlled at present. As they get out of profits only instead of re-investments, national major industries will be devastated.1.10 Absolute

17、Open for Finance and Capital MarketUS based capital can possess 100% shares of Korean domestic banking institutions. US capital can establish loan company in Korea and interest rate will be managed through autonomy syste

18、m.1.11 Clause of No Re-NegotiationAbove 11 clauses are not allowed to re-negotiate under any circumstances.2. ANALYSIS OF COMPETITION POWER BETWEEN KOREA AND USAIn order to understand competition power of industry betwee

19、n Korea-USA, it is required to use several traditionally useful analysis methods. Namely, they are trade intensity index, trade specialization index, revealed comparative advantage index. Even each competition power meas

20、urement index could be fragmentary analysis method to see a certain one side as well as containing concerned problems, it is helpful to see trade structure which industrial competition power made.Trade intensity index an

21、alyze competition relationship by import absorptive power of import country and comparative advantage of export country as well as between 2 countries and comparative trade intensity index is competition power analysis t

22、able which is considered overall world trade flow. Trade specialization index has a little problem to consider only 2 countries (export, import country) transaction without considering world total trade flow. Additionall

23、y, even though revealed comparative advantage index show realized competition power of export country, it has problem that import absorptive power is not considered at all such as market situation of import country. Even